The acute care burden of asthma in children was profoundly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-centre Canadian retrospective study.

Objectives: Asthma is a chronic lung condition that can be exacerbated when triggered by viruses. Pandemic public health restrictions aimed to reduce COVID-19 transmission indirectly effected other circulating viruses. This study assessed the impact of the pandemic and associated public health measures on acute paediatric asthma across four tertiary sites in three Canadian provinces. We queried whether pandemic-related changes would impair preventive care and delay presentation to care, increasing asthma exacerbation severity. Methods: This retrospective study compared the frequency of acute care access and severity of presentation to emergency departments (ED) for acute asthma to four tertiary care children's hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (from March 17, 2020 to June 30, 2021) to a pre-lockdown control period (July 1, 2018 to March 16, 2020). Data was subjected to interrupted time series and Chi-square analysis. Results: Our study included 26,316 acute asthma visits to ED. Sites experienced a 63% to 89% reduction in acute asthma visits during the pandemic, compared with pre-lockdown controls, and a 17% to 85% reduction in asthma, that is out of proportion as a fraction of all-cause ED visits. For asthma, there was no difference in severity measured by rate of ward admission or rate of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission. Conclusions: Public health measures appear to have resulted in a specific protective association on acute asthma with reduced acute care utilization over and above the reduction in all-cause presentations, without an increase in severity upon presentation. Our study indicates an importance to antiviral public health and engineering strategies to reduce viral transmission and thereby asthma morbidity.

Should you test for urinary tract infection in children with respiratory symptoms?

QUESTION: An 8-month-old boy presented to our clinic with a 3-day history of fever. He has had a cough and rhinorrhea since the onset of the fever, and his 4-year-old sibling has recently had cough and cold symptoms. I have heard that the presence of respiratory symptoms means that urinary tract infection (UTI) is less likely. In infants with fever and respiratory symptoms, who should have a sample collected for urinalysis for UTI? ANSWER: The approach to diagnosing febrile infants who have respiratory symptoms varies by age. Urinalysis should be done for all febrile infants younger than 2 months of age, regardless of whether they have respiratory symptoms. Clinicians should assess risk factors for UTI in every infant between 2 and 24 months of age and should not exclude the diagnosis of UTI based on respiratory symptoms alone. Use of a predictive tool to estimate the pretest probability of UTI would aid decision making about patients in this population.

Clinical characteristics and management of pediatric egg-induced anaphylaxis: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Egg is the third most common food allergy in children; however, data on pediatric egg-induced anaphylaxis are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of pediatric egg-induced anaphylaxis. METHODS: Children presenting with anaphylaxis were recruited from 13 emergency departments as part of the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis Registry, from which data on anaphylaxis triggered by egg were extracted. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with prehospital epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) use and to compare anaphylaxis triggered by egg with other triggers of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). RESULTS: We recruited 302 children with egg-induced anaphylaxis. The mean age was 2.6 years (SD = 3.6), and 55.3% were male. Only 39.4% had previously been diagnosed with an egg allergy. Prehospital EAI use was 32.1%, but this was not significantly lower than in other triggers of FIA (P = .26). Only 1.4% of patients required hospital admission. Relative to other triggers of FIA, patients with egg-induced anaphylaxis were significantly younger (P < .001) and exhibited more vomiting (P = .0053) and less throat tightness (P = .0015) and angioedema (P < .001). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest published cohort of pediatric egg-induced anaphylaxis. In this cohort, prehospital EAI use was very low. In addition, we identified certain symptoms that distinguish egg-induced from other triggers of FIA. Taken together, high suspicion is crucial in identifying egg-induced anaphylaxis, given the younger patient demographic and frequent lack of FIA history.

Faut-il dépister une infection des voies urinaires si un enfant a des symptômes respiratoires?

QUESTION: Un garçon de 8 mois est amené à notre clinique parce qu'il fait de la fièvre depuis 3 jours. Depuis l'apparition de la fièvre, il présente de la toux et une rhinorrhée, et son petit frère de 4 ans a aussi eu récemment de la toux et des symptômes du rhume. J'ai entendu dire que la présence de symptômes respiratoires signifiait une moins grande probabilité d'infection des voies urinaires (IVU). Chez quels nourrissons fébriles qui ont des symptômes respiratoires devrait-on faire un prélèvement pour procéder à une analyse d'urine en vue de dépister une IVU? RÉPONSE: La façon de poser un diagnostic chez des nourrissons fébriles présentant des symptômes respiratoires varie selon l'âge. Une analyse d'urine devrait être effectuée chez tous les nourrissons fébriles de moins de 2 mois, qu'ils aient ou non des symptômes respiratoires. Les cliniciens devraient évaluer les facteurs de risque d'une IVU chez tous les nourrissons âgés de 2 à 24 mois et ne devraient pas exclure un diagnostic d'IVU en se fondant seulement sur la présence de symptômes respiratoires. Le recours à un outil prédictif pour estimer la probabilité d'une IVU avant le test pourrait aider à la décision chez les patients de cette population.

Treatment Delay of Febrile Urinary Tract Infections Among Infants With Respiratory Symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether antibiotic treatment of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) is delayed in febrile infants with respiratory symptoms compared with those without. STUDY DESIGN: Data of infants 2-24 months of age diagnosed with UTI from March 1, 2012 to May 31, 2023 were collected from our hospital's medical charts and triage records. Patients with known congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract or a history of febrile UTI were excluded. Patients were classified as having respiratory symptoms if they had any of the following symptoms or clinical signs: cough, rhinorrhea, pharyngeal hyperemia and otitis media. Time to first antibiotic treatment from fever onset was compared between patients with and without respiratory symptoms. A Cox regression model was constructed to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were eligible for analysis. The median age of the eligible patients was 5.0 months (interquartile range: 3.0-8.8) and 118 (55%) were male. There were 104 and 110 patients in the respiratory symptom and no respiratory symptom groups, respectively. The time to first antibiotic treatment was significantly longer in the group with respiratory symptoms (51 hours vs. 21 hours). Respiratory symptoms were significantly associated with a longer time to first treatment after adjustment for age and sex in the Cox regression model (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of febrile UTI infants with respiratory symptoms tends to be delayed. Pediatricians should not exclude febrile UTI even in the presence of respiratory symptoms.

Management of acute supraventricular tachycardia in children.

QUESTION: Recently, a 3-year-old patient in my practice urgently needed to go to the emergency department. The patient was found to have supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and needed immediate treatment with adenosine. What evidence is currently available for management of SVT in children? ANSWER: Supraventricular tachycardia is a common cardiac condition in the pediatric population that manifests as a narrow QRS complex tachycardia on electrocardiography. Symptoms may range from palpitations, poor feeding, and irritability to more substantial hemodynamic instability. Patients who are hemodynamically stable can benefit from interventions such as vagal maneuvers, which can be done in the office. Such maneuvers include the Valsalva maneuver, stimulation of the diving reflex (for infants), and unilateral carotid sinus massage. Other children may need pharmacologic therapies to restore normal heart rhythm, which usually consists of a rapid intravenous injection of adenosine under monitoring. For patients who are hemodynamically unstable, emergency cardioversion may be needed.

Prise en charge de la tachycardie supraventriculaire aiguë chez les enfants.

QUESTION: Récemment, un patient âgé de 3 ans que je voyais en cabinet a dû être rapidement transporté au service d'urgence. On lui a diagnostiqué une tachycardie supraventriculaire (TSV), et de l'adénosine lui a été immédiatement administrée. De quelles données probantes disposons-nous relativement à la prise en charge de la TSV chez les enfants? RÉPONSE: La tachycardie supraventriculaire est un trouble cardiaque courant chez les patients pédiatriques. Elle se manifeste par une diminution de l'amplitude des complexes QRS sur l'électrocardiogramme. Les symptômes vont des palpitations, du manque d'appétit et de l'irritabilité à une instabilité hémodynamique plus significative. Les patients stables sur le plan hémodynamique peuvent bénéficier d'interventions comme les manœuvres vagales, qui peuvent être effectuées en cabinet. Ces manœuvres comprennent la manœuvre de Valsalva, la stimulation du réflexe de plongée (chez les enfants) et la compression unilatérale du sinus carotidien. Chez certains enfants, le rétablissement du rythme cardiaque normal peut demander un traitement pharmacologique consistant en de rapides injections intraveineuses d'adénosine administrées sous surveillance. Les patients présentant une instabilité hémodynamique pourraient nécessiter une cardioversion d'urgence.

Milk-induced anaphylaxis among children presenting to Canadian emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Cow's milk is one of the most common and burdensome allergens in pediatrics, and it can induce severe anaphylactic reactions in children. However, data on cow's milk-induced anaphylaxis are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of pediatric cow's milk-induced anaphylaxis and to determine risk factors for repeat emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration. METHODS: Between April 2011 and May 2023, data were collected on children with anaphylaxis presenting to 10 Canadian EDs. A standardized form documenting symptoms, triggers, treatment, and outcome was used. Multivariate logistic regression was used. RESULTS: Of 3118 anaphylactic reactions, 319 milk-induced anaphylaxis cases were identified (10%). In the prehospital setting, 54% of patients with milk-induced anaphylaxis received intramuscular epinephrine. In those with milk-induced anaphylaxis, receiving epinephrine before presenting to the ED was associated with a reduced risk of requiring 2 or more epinephrine doses in the ED (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.90-0.99]). Children younger than 5 years of age were more likely to experience a mild reaction compared with that in older children, who experienced a moderate reaction more often (P < .0001). Compared with other forms of food-induced anaphylaxis, children presenting with milk-induced anaphylaxis were younger; a greater proportion experienced wheezing and vomiting, and less experienced angioedema. CONCLUSION: Prehospital epinephrine in pediatric milk-induced anaphylaxis is underused; however, it may decrease risk of requiring 2 ED epinephrine doses. Milk-induced anaphylaxis in children younger than 5 years of age may be less severe than in older children. Wheezing and vomiting are more prevalent in milk-induced anaphylaxis compared with that of other foods.

Managing anaphylaxis: Epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids: More than 10 years of Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis REgistry data.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis but is often replaced with antihistamines or corticosteroids. Delayed epinephrine administration is a risk factor for fatal anaphylaxis. Convincing data on the role of antihistamines and corticosteroids in anaphylaxis management are sparse. OBJECTIVE: To establish the impact of prehospital treatment with epinephrine, antihistamines, and/or corticosteroids on anaphylaxis management. METHODS: Patients presenting with anaphylaxis were recruited prospectively and retrospectively in 10 Canadian and 1 Israeli emergency departments (EDs) between April 2011 and August 2022, as part of the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis REgistry. Data on anaphylaxis cases were collected using a standardized form. Primary outcomes were uncontrolled reactions (>2 doses of epinephrine in ED), no prehospital epinephrine use, use of intravenous fluids in ED, and hospital admission. Multivariate regression was used to identify factors associated with primary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 5364 reactions recorded, median age was 8.8 years (IQR, 3.78-16.9); 54.9% of the patients were males, and 52.5% had a known food allergy. In the prehospital setting, 37.9% received epinephrine; 44.3% received antihistamines, and 3.15% received corticosteroids. Uncontrolled reactions happened in 250 reactions. Patients treated with prehospital epinephrine were less likely to have uncontrolled reactions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.955 [95% CI, 0.943-0.967]), receive intravenous fluids in ED (aOR, 0.976 [95% CI, 0.959-0.992]), and to be admitted after the reaction (aOR, 0.964 [95% CI, 0.949-0.980]). Patients treated with prehospital antihistamines were less likely to have uncontrolled reactions (aOR, 0.978 [95% CI, 0.967-0.989]) and to be admitted after the reaction (aOR, 0.963 [95% CI, 0.949-0.977]). Patients who received prehospital corticosteroids were more likely to require intravenous fluids in ED (aOR, 1.059 [95% CI, 1.013-1.107]) and be admitted (aOR, 1.232 [95% CI, 1.181-1.286]). CONCLUSION: Our findings in this predominantly pediatric population support the early use of epinephrine and suggest a beneficial effect of antihistamines. Corticosteroid use in anaphylaxis should be revisited.

Antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in children.

QUESTION: A 4-year-old child was seen in our clinic with a clinical presentation consistent with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). He was prescribed oral amoxicillin and a colleague asked about the duration of treatment. What is the current available evidence for treatment duration for uncomplicated CAP in an outpatient setting? ANSWER: Previously the recommended duration of antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated CAP was 10 days. Recent evidence from several randomized controlled trials suggests that a 3- to 5-day duration is noninferior to a longer treatment course. In an effort to prescribe the shortest effective duration of antibiotics to minimize the risk of antimicrobial resistance associated with prolonged antibiotic use, family physicians should offer 3 to 5 days of appropriate antibiotics and monitor the recovery of children with CAP.

Durée d'une antibiothérapie pour une pneumonie acquise dans la communauté chez l'enfant.

QUESTION: Un enfant de 4 ans est venu à notre clinique, présentant un tableau clinique conforme à une pneumonie acquise dans la communauté (PAC). On lui a prescrit de l'amoxicilline par voie orale, et un collègue s'est demandé quelle devrait être la durée du traitement. Quelles sont les données probantes actuelles concernant la durée du traitement pour une PAC sans complication en milieu ambulatoire? RÉPONSE: La durée d'une antibiothérapie auparavant recommandée pour une PAC sans complication était de 10 jours. Des données probantes récentes tirées de quelques essais randomisés contrôlés indiquent qu'une durée de 3 à 5 jours n'est pas inférieure à un régime thérapeutique plus long. Dans un effort pour prescrire la durée efficace la plus courte afin de minimiser le risque d'une résistance antimicrobienne liée à une utilisation prolongée d'antibiotiques, les médecins de famille devraient offrir de 3 à 5 jours d'antibiotiques appropriés et surveiller le rétablissement des enfants souffrant d'une PAC.

Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome in children.

QUESTION: I frequently see adolescents with recurrent abdominal pain in my family medicine clinic. While the diagnosis frequently is a benign condition such as constipation, I recently heard that after 2 years of recurrent pain, an adolescent was diagnosed with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES). How is this condition diagnosed? What is the recommended treatment? ANSWER: Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome, first described almost 100 years ago, is caused by entrapment of the anterior branch of the abdominal cutaneous nerve as it pierces the anterior rectus abdominis muscle fascia. The limited awareness of the condition in North America results in misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis. Carnett sign-in which pain worsens when using a "hook-shaped" finger to palpate a purposefully tense abdominal wall-helps to confirm if pain originates from the abdominal viscera or from the abdominal wall. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were not found to be effective, but ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injections seem to be an effective and safe treatment for ACNES, resulting in relief of pain in most adolescents. For those with ACNES and ongoing pain, surgical cutaneous neurectomy by a pediatric surgeon should be considered.

Le syndrome de compression du nerf cutané antérieur chez l'enfant.

QUESTION: À ma clinique de médecine familiale, je vois souvent des adolescents souffrant de douleur abdominale récurrente. Le diagnostic est fréquemment un problème bénin comme la constipation, mais j'ai récemment entendu dire qu'un adolescent, après 2 ans de douleur récurrente, avait reçu un diagnostic de syndrome de compression du nerf cutané antérieur (ACNES). Comment ce problème est-il diagnostiqué, et quel est le traitement recommandé? RÉPONSE: Le syndrome de compression du nerf cutané antérieur, décrit initialement il y a près de 100 ans, est causé par la compression de la branche antérieure du nerf cutané abdominal qui empiète sur le fascia du muscle grand droit antérieur de l'abdomen. La connaissance limitée de ce problème en Amérique du Nord entraîne des diagnostics erronés et un retard dans le diagnostic réel. Le signe de Carnett, selon lequel la douleur s'aggrave lors de la palpation de la paroi abdominale intentionnellement tendue avec un doigt « en forme de crochet ¼, aide à confirmer si la douleur provient des viscères abdominaux ou de la paroi abdominale. L'acétaminophène et les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens ne se sont pas révélés efficaces, mais des injections locales d'anesthésiques guidées par échographie semblent un traitement sûr et efficace pour l'ACNES, et elles entraînent un soulagement de la douleur chez la plupart des adolescents. Pour ceux dont l'ACNES et les douleurs persistent, il y a lieu d'envisager une neurectomie cutanée par un chirurgien pédiatrique.

Neuroimaging to diagnose central nervous system tumours in children.

QUESTION: Headache, vomiting, lethargy, and seizures are common symptoms in healthy children with benign viral illnesses, but they are also signs that could represent a central nervous system (CNS) tumour. Primary care providers and guardians are hesitant to expose children to radiation associated with computed tomography scans or take on risks associated with the sedation frequently needed for magnetic resonance imaging. When should primary care providers order radiologic head imaging for children with common symptoms to identify those with a CNS tumour? ANSWER: Central nervous system tumours have no pathognomonic features, which often results in delays in diagnosis. Owing to the high prevalence of infratentorial tumours, children commonly present with symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, making a detailed history and a comprehensive physical examination, including ophthalmoscopy for papilledema, especially important. Magnetic resonance imaging is the criterion standard test but it may take time to access, and young children may need sedation. Hence, computed tomography may be a preferable first option.The HeadSmart initiative in the United Kingdom provides guidance to obtain brain imaging within 4 weeks of onset of persistent symptoms that are associated with CNS tumours. We advocate applying the same criteria in Canada in order to reduce delay in diagnosis of CNS tumours in children.

Factors associated with US caregivers' uptake of pediatric COVID-19 vaccine by race and ethnicity.

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in willingness to vaccinate children against COVID-19, and factors that may be associated with increased acceptance, among US caregivers of various racial and ethnic identities who presented with their child to the Emergency Department (ED) after emergency use authorization of vaccines for children ages 5-11. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey of caregivers presenting to 11 pediatric EDs in the United States in November-December 2021. Caregivers were asked about their identified race and ethnicity and if they planned to vaccinate their child. We collected demographic data and inquired about caregiver concerns related to COVID-19. We compared responses by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression models served to determine factors that were independently associated with increased vaccine acceptance overall and among racial/ethnic groups. RESULTS: Among 1916 caregivers responding, 54.67% planned to vaccinate their child against COVID-19. Large differences in acceptance were noted by race/ethnicity, with highest acceptance among Asian caregivers (61.1%) and those who did not specify a listed racial identity (61.1%); caregivers identifying as Black (44.7%) or Multi-racial (44.4%) had lower acceptance rates. Factors associated with intent to vaccinate differed by racial/ethnic group, and included caregiver COVID-19 vaccine receipt (all groups), caregiver concerns about COVID-19 (White caregivers), and having a trusted primary provider (Black caregivers). CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver intent to vaccinate children against COVID-19 varied by race/ethnicity, but race/ethnicity did not independently account for these differences. Caregiver COVID-19 vaccination status, concerns about COVID-19, and presence of a trusted primary provider are important in vaccination decisions.

Corticosteroids for infectious mononucleosis.

QUESTION: Infectious mononucleosis (IM) is a common viral infection year round, and we see patients with it in our family medicine clinic frequently. With fatigue, fever, pharyngitis, and cervical or generalized lymphadenopathy causing prolonged illness and school absences, we always look for treatments that will shorten the duration of symptoms. Does treatment with corticosteroids benefit these children? ANSWER: Current evidence points to small and inconsistent benefits when using corticosteroids for symptom relief in children with IM. Corticosteroids alone or in combination with antiviral medications should not be given to children for common symptoms of IM. Corticosteroids should be reserved for those with impending airway obstruction, autoimmune complications, or other severe circumstances.

Temporal trends in anaphylaxis ED visits over the last decade and the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on these trends.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an acute systemic and potentially fatal allergic reaction. We evaluated trends in yearly rates of anaphylaxis in a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) in Montreal, Canada. METHODS: A prospective and retrospective recruitment process was used to find families of children who had presented with anaphylaxis at the Montreal Children's Hospital between April 2011 and April 2021. Using a uniform recruitment form, data were collected. Anaphylaxis patterns were compared to clinical triggers using descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Among 830,382 ED visits during the study period, 2726 (26% recruited prospectively) presented with anaphylaxis. The median age was 6 years (IQR: 0.2, 12.00), and 58.7% were males. The relative frequency of anaphylaxis cases doubled between 2011-2015, from 0.22% (95% CI, 0.19, 0.26) to 0.42 March 2020, the total absolute number of anaphylaxis cases and relative frequency declined by 24 cases per month (p < 0.05) and by 0.5% of ED visits (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of anaphylaxis has changed over the years, representing modifications in food introduction strategies or lifestyle changes. The decrease in the frequency of anaphylaxis presenting to the ED during the COVID pandemic may reflect decreased accidental exposures with reduced social gatherings, closed school, and reluctance to present to ED.

Impact of Time to Diagnosis on Morbidity and Survival in Children With Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the impact of time to diagnosis (TTD) on morbidity and mortality and to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) in pediatric patients with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all malignant CNS tumors presenting to 2 tertiary care pediatric hospitals from 2000 to 2019. Cox proportional hazard model analysis outcomes included TTD and OS as well as morbidity; stratified by tumor category, age, relapse, and presence of metastatic disease. RESULTS: There were 197 children with malignant CNS tumors (mean age 8.7 y, 61% male). Tumors included medulloblastoma (N=58, 29.4%), ependymoma (N=27, 13.7%), high-grade glioma (N=42, 21.3%), germ cell tumors (N=47, 23.9%), and other embryonal tumors (N=23, 11.7%). Median TTD from symptom onset was 62 (interquartile range: 26.5 to 237.5 d) and 28% had metastatic disease. Three-year progression free survival was 55% and 3-year OS was 73.1%. Increased OS was associated with increased TTD (parameter estimate 0.12; confidence interval [CI]: 0.019-7.06; P =0.019), high-grade glioma (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46; CI [1.03-5.86]; P =0.042), other embryonal tumor (HR: 2.84; CI [1.06-7.56]; P =0.037), relapse (HR: 10.14; CI: 4.52-22.70; P <0.001) and metastatic disease (HR: 3.25; CI: 1.51-6.96; P =0.002). Vision change (HR: 0.58; CI: 0.313-1.06; P =0.078), hearing loss (HR: 0.71; CI: 0.35-1.42; P =0.355), and cognitive impairment (HR: 0.73; CI: 0.45-1.19; P =0.205) were not associated with TTD in this model. CONCLUSIONS: Increased median TTD is associated with higher OS in pediatric patients treated for malignant CNS tumors. Tumor biology and treatment modality are more important factors than TTD for predicting morbidity and long-term outcomes in pediatric patients with CNS tumors.

Insulin pump complications among children with diabetes.

QUESTION: Several children with diabetes in our clinic use continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. Recently a 5-year-old presented with a dysfunctional pump, and it took 2 days to identify the problem and resolve it. What are the potential pitfalls of insulin pumps in children and how can these be prevented? ANSWER: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps has increased considerably during the past decade. Adverse events can range from mild events that can be resolved by troubleshooting at home, to severe incidents that necessitate admission to the hospital. Adverse events include technical issues, skin complications that can lead to infection, and metabolic imbalances that can lead to hospitalization. Long-term monitoring and targeted education are needed for children and their families to ensure early identification of problems with the pump and to avoid diabetic ketoacidosis or hypoglycemia.